requestId:68518620ee1ed8.78820803.
Laid the foundation for the new era of Chinese philosophy: An explanation of the benevolence theory by Mr. Chen Chengshang Teacher
Author: Yang Lihua
Source: “History of Chinese Philosophy” 2022 Issue 2
Abstract: Mr. Chen Chengshang Teacher Chen Chengshang’s “The Benevolence Theory” talks with Eastern Philosophy on the basis of inheriting the tradition of benevolence and loving Confucian philosophy, and expounds the basic connotation of the Confucian benevolence theory. The theory of benevolence is the theory of benevolence as the body, and it is also the theory of benevolence as the body. Teacher Chen Lai has a high sense of self-conception about the theory of benevolence. The famous player started in the game. However, he lacked education – before graduating from junior high school, he showed the characteristics of benevolence through the narratives of Confucian history and demonstrated the value orientation of Confucianism. The theory of the genius is a model of contemporary Chinese philosophy.
Keywords: benevolence; body system; Chinese philosophy
For contemporary Chinese philosophy—whether it is tangible or broad, the book “The Benevolence of the Benevolence” has milestone meanings. The construction of the Renxue system theory has made the philosophical connotation and quality of Mr. Chen, who has been dedicated to the history of Chinese philosophy, presented in a complete and systematic manner with a complete and systematic form. This philosophical creation once again certified the close relationship between philosophy tasks and philosophical history research. Just as the process of benevolence highlighted in the works in the history of Confucian philosophy, the decades of special research by Mr. Chen can also see the process of benevolence in his personal philosophical thinking. This article attempts to explain the philosophy of the system of the benevolence and to use this to briefly understand the meaning and value of the roots of China’s inherent philosophical tradition for the future construction of Chinese philosophy.
1. Coordination
Based on the attitude towards philosophical traditions, Mr. Chen divided the tasks of philosophers into two categories: one that emphasizes the history of philosophy. href=”http://www.twdaddytalk.org/”>Baohuang.com contemplates the integration of traditions and develops, deepens and creates new things on the basis of integration, such as Zhu Xi and Hegel; the other type challenges the traditions of philosophy history with a consistent attitude, such as Li Rong, Nietzsche, and Heidegger. The latter often “cannot abandon past philosophical developments without evidence” and “will inevitably cause ideological reluctance.” [1] Even if we do not use the past philosophical history as a logical circle like Hegel, we will always embark on the path of philosophical thinking under the guidance of the foreman. The vast and true light of philosophy that has been transmitted through honest thoughts and pursuits has always been instigating the new philosophy to be fully qualified. The most basic mistake is to split the traditional philosophy from the history of philosophy. With this errorWhat is accompanied by is often the lack of careful character that should be possessed by thinking. Once philosophical thinking falls to the inner standard of self-restraint, it can lead to disaster-prone consequences. Thinking has always been a key element of the historical process, so thinkers cannot be exempted from the responsibility of history. Beware of “relaxation in thinking” is not a special attention to all constructive philosophical thinking needs.
The “From the Mind” of each era is based on the exploration of later generations, and the creative complexity of philosophy will always be developed in obvious or inconsistencies and references under the conditions of clearly identifying the purpose. This kind of self-conscious mind wears the “RenBaohuan Online ExperienceLearn the Body Discussion”. The dialogue with Oriental Philosophy, especially the translation of Oriental Philosophy that has been translated into the Han Chinese world, is a basic language that contemporary Chinese philosophy has to face. The Oriental philosopher whom “The Instrumental Discussion” seems casual, but actually has profound considerations. While emphasizing the differences between the inherent metaphysical traditions of China and the intrinsic theory in Oriental philosophy, Mr. Chen determined the most basic nature of metaphysics in philosophical thinking, and cited the related arguments of Kant and Hegel as synonyms. Concepts such as “orthodon” and “orthodon” are mistakenly believed by departmental scholars to be born from the Oriental Philosophy’s introduction. In fact, this is a concept that is inherent in Chinese philosophy and has many major related discussions. Squinnosa and other modern physical concepts, near Chinese philosophy. It’s like Xiong Shili’s later philosophy that the body is neither the mind nor the object, and the mind and matter are used as the purpose, that is, there is something that can be connected with Spheresa. Of course, Sphenorsha has no real insight into being used. And, for Starsha, the physical and the style are causal and effectual relationships, and the relationship differences between benevolence and benevolence are rooted in the universe. Regarding Heidegger, who once had a hooded impact in the Chinese philosophy community, the comments of Mr. Chen, Mr. Chen, can be summarized into the following points: First, Being’s problem is a unique problem in Eastern languages and philosophy, and Chinese philosophy should not be based on it; Second, Heidegger believes that the world is the way of human existence, the structure in which other things can be seen, and the world and others are reality that people realize, the predecessor condition of human existence, not the result of display; third, the sunken sky of human beings seems to have the appearance of snow falling. Song Wei dragged his suitcase and lived in a living environment, which is related to things that are “utensils”. This is still a kind of personality of everything and cannot develop the ethical principle of “love things”. Fourthly, Heidegger’s common ground emphasizes that others are part of the self and are published from the structure of human living existence. But he advocated that the real existence existed, valued the distance between him and others, and said that it was still personal, and had a fundamental difference between me and Confucian people. Although overall he has a negative attitude towards Heidegger’s philosophy, 快的官网For his strong tuning of the phenomenon, Mr. Chen gave him sufficient confirmation, thinking that it was similar to the philosophical manifestation used by Xiong Shili in his late years. The comprehensive creation of philosophy was finally based on the inclusion and defeat of thoughts for future generations. This emotional attitude was a neat attitude in the thinking of Master Chen Lai. Regarding the process philosophy of Tsehai, Mr. Chen gave considerable attention to it. The process philosophy of Tsehai emphasizes the continuity, correlation and overallness, and has been widely regarded by Chinese philosophers. Of course, the important thing about “The Instrumental Discussion” to the introduction of the Sea of Wei is to say that Xiong Shili was the momentary statement. The special sea divides the world into the world of value and the world of reality, and takes the world of value as its main body. Although this area is not a secondary principle, its thinking points to the ability to develop moral or ethical cosmic theory. As for the specialbaohuai.com, he believes that the world of value and the world of reality have no physical nature, so he is not accepted by benevolent philosophy. The modern Joseon philosophical tradition represented by Martin Buber and Levinas has a consistent point in the discussion of benevolence. But the religious backs and orientations at its roots are most fundamentally different from Confucian philosophy. Mr. Chen, who judged the Western School, did not be both simplistic and polite, but chose a clearly related thinking system based on the needs of thinking and discussion, so that dialogue and references were organically integrated into the system structure of the benevolent academic system. The analysis of Western academic institutions is focused on the mastery of macroscopy, without placing the detailed certification. This is related to the theoretical and graphic requirements of “first to establish the greatness” of the “Benevolence and Institutional Discussion”, and it is also a specific manifestation of Mr. Chen’s unique understanding of philosophy certificates.
The inheritance and development of traditional Confucian philosophy is the self-perception of benevolence. Mr. Chen, the teacher, has seen the progress of the benevolence in the development of Confucian philosophy. This fundamental insight enriches and deepens the perspective of studying Confucian history. The “Book of Benevolence” gave sufficient attention to Dong Zhongshu’s philosophical contributions such as loving benevolence, “The law of benevolence lies in loving people, not in loving me”, and establishing benevolence as the way of heaven. Regarding Zhu Zi’s philosophy, the focus on rational and erotic
發佈留言